So, why are we still campaigning?
May 23rd, 2010 by Jane received 2 Comments »While we greatly welcomed Theresa May’s change of opinion on QT, and do not doubt her sincerity, there are still a few valid concerns we have and do not feel that her statement has yet gone far enough, since:
1) She has only explained her new views on gay adoption (not even by expressing a belief that same-sex couples are equally capable, but that they are the lesser of two evils between institutionalisation and having homosexual parents).
2) She has yet to explain why she voted consistently against LGBT rights in the past (for a full outline of her voting record, see our website http://www.sacktheresamay.co.uk/)
3) She has yet to explain why she changed her mind on each of these issues (adoption aside)
4) She has yet to apologise for these votes, choosing instead to explain them away by saying they were ‘some years ago’, brushing away the fact her votes were consistent over 11 years and as recent as Oct. 2008 (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill)
5) Therefore, even if we are to assume she has genuinely changed her mind on each and every one of these issues, symbolically she is still a poor choice.
This symbolism is important since, where a public servant has a responsibility to promote fairness to a certain section of society, public confidence in that official requires that there be no appearance of prejudice which might taint the proper exercise of her duties. Moreover, when such public confidence is not held then, regardless of the strength of the grounds of such a complaint, the group that feels discriminated against will feel incredibly ostracised.
Therefore, both in the interests of Theresa May‘s ability to fulfil her duty properly, and in the interests of the mental well-being of the LGBT community, we feel that a statement explaining her current views would be immensely beneficial.
This statement, in the form of an affidavit, would explain her regret of her previous voting record; provide a full explanation of her previous views in each instance and of how and why she has changed her mind; contain a pledge for the furtherance of LGBT rights; and, most importantly, an apology.
Once this has been done, only then can we judge her based on her actions, for who are we to declare that she a liar, intrinsically unfit for the job? But until such a statement is released, we feel we are justified in continuing are campaign.
Tommy Peto
Campaign Co-Founder



